Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Hankinson, Counsel for the First Respondent, on a licensed access basis by Dads Unlimited (a registered charity)
Miss Furness, Counsel for the Second and Third Respondents, instructed by Reeds Solicitors
             The Court is concerned with two children, 'G' and 'B' who are twelve and nine years old respectively.
              Their mother is 'AM'. The children's father is 'RF'. The children are parties to the proceedings through their rule 16.4 Children's Guardian.
              In the Court below, 'AM' represented herself. 'RF' was represented then, as he is today, by Mr Hankinson of Counsel, on a licensed access basis. The children were represented at that hearing by Miss Kang of Counsel.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.