Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
• Thirty nine acrylic fibres found in the applicant's hair matched the balaclava helmet that had been found in the Peugeot car;
• Firearm residues found in the pocket of the jacket that the applicant had been wearing when arrested on 13 April 1988;
• The applicant had been found in a car some five to six miles from the scene of the attack approximately an hour after it had taken place;
• The manner in which the applicant and Mr McCartan had given their evidence And their demeanour in the witness box which suggested to him that they had been lying;
• The "very strong" inferences that were to be drawn against the applicant under article 3 of the 1988 Order;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.