Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff member of the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Non-conversion of a fixed-term contract into a contract of indefinite duration – Legitimate expectations – Action for annulment and for damages )
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 20 September 2024,
composed of S. Rodin, President of the Chamber, N. Piçarra and N. Fenger (Rapporteur), Judges,
having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to rule by reasoned order, pursuant to Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice,
By his appeal, RS seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 July 2024, RS v EIB (T‑624/22, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:T:2024:461 ), by which the General Court dismissed his action for annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 20 December 2021 not to convert his employment contract into a contract of indefinite duration (‘the non-conversion decision’), for compensation for the damage he allegedly suffered as a result, and for annulment of the EIB’s letter of 20 December 2021 confirming the non-conversion decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.