General

YW v Ofsted

[2009] UKFTT HESC 232First-tier Tribunal (Health Education and Social Care Chamber)2009

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

And that the Respondent wished to investigate it concerns and that the test for regulation 9 had been met.

The suspension shall be for a period of six weeks. But the suspension may be lifted at any time if the circumstances described in regulation 9 cease to exist.

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More General cases

Mrs S Copeland v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination)

[2026] UKET 6016328_2025

Pepper Finance Corporation [Ireland] Designated Activity Company v O'Reilly [Otherwise O'Reilly] (Approved)

[2026] IEHC 2026IEHC16

Charles Kelly Ltd v Companies Act 2014 (Approved)

[2026] IEHC 2026IEHC140

O'Donnell v Superintendent For The Cahir District and Anor (Approved)

[2026] IEHC 2026IEHC226

Rogers v The Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors (Approved)

[2026] IEHC 2026IECA5

Pender v Punter Southall Group Limited (Court of Appeal : Appeal (Civil) : Crow, Perry, Wolffe : Costs)

[2026] UR 2026_073

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.