Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.������ The appellant, Ms. O�Flynn, together with her former husband, established a company called BOD Investments (IRL) Ltd. (Company No. 221820) in September 1994.� Her ex-husband, Mr. O�Flynn, had 39,999 shares and the appellant had one share.
2.������ The respondent solicitor was instructed on behalf of the company in relation to the majority, and it may well be the vast majority, of the company�s property transactions.
3.������ The appellant makes complaints about various matters occurring between 1997 and 2011, including not being kept informed of the affairs of the company and most strikingly claims that her signature was forged on various documents.
4.������ The company was struck off on two occasions.� It was restored to the register on 26th March, 2000 and later on 24th October, 2005 after a second strike-off.
5.������ The appellant says that she learned of the company�s significant indebtedness to Revenue in December 2012.� A liquidator was appointed in April 2014, and on 11th March, 2015 she was listed as a tax defaulter in national newspapers.� In fairness to the appellant it must be noted that she had no knowledge of the Revenue indebtedness at the time at which the liability arose.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.