Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
HU/54818/2022, HU/54819/2022 HU/55785/2022, HU/55784/2022 HU/55783/2022, HU/55782/2022 HU/54820/2022, HU/59274/2022 HU/55627/2022, HU/59278/2022 HU/55628/2022, HU/55629/2022
Although this is an appeal by the Entry Clearance Officer, we refer to the parties as they were in the First-tier Tribunal.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellants are granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellants and/or any member of their family , likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellants and/or any member of their family . Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              The appellants are nationals of Afghanistan. The first appellant is married to the second appellant and they have four children. The seventh appellant is married to the eighth appellant and they have four children. The second and seventh appellants are brothers. The appellants applied for family reunion with the sponsor, the sister of the second and seventh appellants. The sponsor has indefinite leave to remain in the UK and is married to a British citizen. The sponsor and her husband have four children.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.