Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment contains my written reasons in relation to various directions I issued following a contested directions hearing.
The background to this dispute is set out in my previous decision in this matter dated 8 th February 2021 reported at A v Minister for Social Services [2021] JRC 036 . I adopt paragraphs 2 and 3 of that judgment for ease of reference.
Notwithstanding the stay granted by that judgment, the matter has not settled as a result of which a further directions hearing became necessary. The possibility of this was foreshadowed in my previous judgment at paragraph 26 where I stated as follows: -
The particular issues I had to resolve at the latest directions hearing are as follows: -
(ii) Whether directions are needed for the exchange of witness statements of fact;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.