Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellants: Mr P Jorro of Counsel, instructed by Saint Martin Solicitors
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellants are granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellants, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellants. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.
              The Appellants appeal with permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judges Bulpitt and Hughes promulgated on 19 June 2023, in which the Appellants' appeals against the decision to refuse their protection and human rights claims dated 30 September 2022 were dismissed.
              In the Respondent's review during the course of the appeal before the First-tier Tribunal, there was further consideration of new evidence about a criminal complaint in December 2022. The Respondent rejected this part of the claim on credibility grounds, not accepting that there was a complaint and overall not accepting that the Appellant had come to the adverse attention of the state authorities in Bangladesh.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.