Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Positive obligations • Lack of any opportunity to have same-sex relationships formally acknowledged, not striking a fair balance between interests at stake • Lack of legal recognition resulting in serious daily obstacles for same-sex couples • No prevailing community interest • Wide margin of appreciation to States in choosing form of registration of same-sex unions, overstepped in present case
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Paul Lemmens, President, ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Dmitry Dedov, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Anja Seibert-Fohr, ��������� Peeter Roosma, ��������� Andreas Z�nd, judges, and Milan Bla�ko, Section Registrar,
the applications (nos. 40792/10 , 30538/14, and 43439/14) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by six Russian nationals, listed in the appended table (�the applicants�), on the dates indicated in that table;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.