Skip to main content
Criminal law

Inchoate offences

Inchoate offences criminalise steps taken towards a substantive crime that is never completed — the three main forms are attempt, conspiracy, and encouraging or assisting crime. The defendant can be liable even though the intended offence never happened.

Last reviewed 14 June 2026

Attempt is governed by section 1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981: a person is guilty if, with intent to commit an offence, they do an act that is 'more than merely preparatory' to its commission. Whether conduct crosses that line is a question for the jury — in R v Geddes a man found in school toilets with a knife and rope had not gone beyond preparation, whereas a defendant who has embarked on the offence proper will have.

Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to pursue a course of conduct that will necessarily amount to an offence (statutory conspiracy under section 1 of the Criminal Law Act 1977). Encouraging or assisting an offence replaced the old common law offence of incitement and now sits in sections 44 to 46 of the Serious Crime Act 2007.

The mens rea is demanding: attempt requires an intention to commit the full offence, even where the substantive crime can itself be committed recklessly. Impossibility is generally no defence — in R v Shivpuri the House of Lords held that a defendant who dealt in what he believed were prohibited drugs was guilty of attempt even though the substance turned out to be harmless.

Key cases

  • R v Geddes (1996) 160 JP 697
  • R v Shivpuri [1987] AC 1
  • R v Gullefer [1990] 1 WLR 1063

Frequently asked questions

What are the three inchoate offences?

Attempt (Criminal Attempts Act 1981), conspiracy (Criminal Law Act 1977), and encouraging or assisting crime (Serious Crime Act 2007). Each punishes conduct aimed at a crime that is not completed.

What does 'more than merely preparatory' mean?

It is the test for criminal attempt under s 1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981. The defendant must have moved beyond planning and preparation and embarked on the actual commission of the offence; whether they have is a question of fact for the jury.

Is impossibility a defence to attempt?

Generally no. In R v Shivpuri the defendant was guilty of attempting to deal in drugs even though the substance was harmless, because liability turns on what he intended and believed.

Related doctrines

Revising criminal law for an exam?

Get structured revision notes and timed SQE1 practice that build on Inchoate offences.

Revising law for an exam?

Get the free “50 Must-Know Cases for UK Law Exams” guide — grouped by module with the ratio for each, sent to your inbox.