EU law, Brexit, and the retained EU law regime
The constitutional transformation wrought by accession, membership, and withdrawal from the European Union.
Overview
The United Kingdom's relationship with the European Union has posed the most far-reaching challenge to traditional conceptions of parliamentary sovereignty since the principle was articulated by Dicey. From 1 January 1973 until 31 January 2020 (with a transition period ending 31 December 2020), the UK was a Member State of what became the EU, during which time EU law—comprising treaties, regulations, directives, and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)—formed part of domestic law. The principles of supremacy and direct effect, developed by the CJEU in foundational rulings such as Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL, required national courts to give effect to EU law even where it conflicted with domestic statutes, a requirement that sat uneasily with the orthodox view that Parliament cannot bind its successors.
The legal mechanics of membership were supplied by the European Communities Act 1972 (ECA), which provided that rights and obligations arising under the treaties were to be "recognised and available in law, and be enforced, allowed and followed accordingly" (s 2(1)) and that Acts of Parliament were to be construed subject to the principle that directly effective EU law takes priority (s 2(4)). The constitutional accommodation reached by the courts—most clearly in Factortame (No 2) [1991] and Thoburn [2002]—was that supremacy was a rule of domestic law deriving from the ECA, not from the EU's own doctrine, and that Parliament could always expressly repeal the ECA or legislate contrary to EU law using clear words.
The referendum of 23 June 2016 and the subsequent notification of withdrawal under Article 50 TEU triggered the most significant constitutional realignment in modern British history. The litigation in Miller (No 1) [2017] clarified that the Crown could not use prerogative powers to trigger Article 50 without statutory authorisation, given that withdrawal would remove domestic rights created by Parliament in the ECA. The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EUWA 2018), heavily amended in 2019 and 2020, repealed the ECA, converted the acquis into "retained EU law", and attempted to 'freeze' the body of EU law operative at the end of the transition period. The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (REUL 2023) further reformed this regime, assimilating most retained EU law into ordinary domestic law and removing special interpretive principles.
This note examines the constitutional principles governing EU law during membership, the process and legal effects of withdrawal, and the evolving framework for retained EU law post-Brexit. It draws on the sovereignty and prerogative doctrines covered in earlier weeks and situates Brexit as a live case study in the flexibility—and fragility—of the UK's uncodified constitution.
Want the rest of the canon?
Get the free “50 Must-Know Cases for UK Law Exams” guide plus weekly study tips, sent to your inbox.