Skip to main content

SQE1 · FLK1 · Remedies for Breach

Remedies for Breach of Contract: Damages and Equitable Relief

Remedies for Breach of Contract

Damages — General Principles

Purpose: to put the innocent party in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed (expectation/loss of bargain measure): Robinson v Harman (1848).

Remoteness

  • Loss is recoverable only if it was within the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time of contracting as a not unlikely consequence of the breach.
  • First limb: loss arising naturally from the breach (Hadley v Baxendale (1854)).
  • Second limb: loss arising from special circumstances communicated to the defendant at the time of contracting (Hadley v Baxendale).
  • Refined in Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries [1949]: actual knowledge of special circumstances required for second-limb loss.

Mitigation

  • The innocent party must take reasonable steps to mitigate loss. They cannot recover avoidable loss: Payzu v Saunders [1919].
  • No duty to take unreasonable steps.

Quantification

  • Expectation loss: value of the promised performance.
  • Reliance loss: expenditure wasted in reliance on the contract (alternative where expectation loss is hard to prove): Anglia Television v Reed [1972].
  • Loss of chance: recoverable where the chance lost had a real or substantial prospect of materialising: Chaplin v Hicks [1911].

Agreed Damages Clauses

  • A liquidated damages clause is enforceable if it is a genuine pre-estimate of loss.
  • A penalty clause is void/unenforceable. Test: whether the clause is a secondary obligation that imposes a detriment out of all proportion to the legitimate interest of the innocent party in performance: Cavendish Square Holding v Makdessi [2015] (Supreme Court, replacing the older penalty test).

Equitable Remedies

Specific Performance

  • Discretionary order to perform the contract. Available where damages are inadequate: typically contracts for unique goods or land.
  • Not awarded for personal service contracts or where constant court supervision would be required.

Injunction

  • May be granted to restrain breach of a negative contractual obligation.
  • Follows the American Cyanamid [1975] principles at interim stage: serious issue, balance of convenience, adequacy of damages.

Common SQE Traps

  • Confusing penalty clauses (unenforceable) with liquidated damages (enforceable) — always apply the Cavendish test.
  • Assuming the claimant can recover all loss without checking remoteness and mitigation.
  • Thinking specific performance is available for personal service contracts — it is not.
Exam tip: In a remedies question, always address: (1) which measure of loss; (2) remoteness (Hadley); (3) mitigation; (4) whether any agreed damages clause applies (Cavendish).

Keep going