What is the ratio in R v Assange?

Consent to sexual intercourse on specific conditions does not constitute consent to intercourse without those conditions. Breaching the terms on which consent was given can vitiate that consent.

What did the court decide in R v Assange?

The Divisional Court held that the alleged conduct would constitute sexual offences under English law, as consent given conditionally does not extend to acts beyond those conditions.

Why is R v Assange important for sexual offences law?

Though an extradition case, it clarified that consent can be conditional and that breaching those conditions can constitute sexual offending, influencing understanding of consent boundaries.

What is the ratio in R v Assange?

Consent to sexual intercourse on specific conditions does not constitute consent to intercourse without those conditions. Breaching the terms on which consent was given can vitiate that consent.

What did the court decide in R v Assange?

The Divisional Court held that the alleged conduct would constitute sexual offences under English law, as consent given conditionally does not extend to acts beyond those conditions.

Why is R v Assange important for sexual offences law?

Though an extradition case, it clarified that consent can be conditional and that breaching those conditions can constitute sexual offending, influencing understanding of consent boundaries.

Criminal1 min read

R v Assange

[2011] EWHC 2849 (Admin)Queen's Bench Division2011

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

“Extradition case clarifying consent boundaries and deceptive conduct in sexual offences.”

Facts

Julian Assange was subject to a European Arrest Warrant issued by Sweden in connection with allegations of sexual offences. The allegations involved consensual sexual activity that allegedly continued in ways not consented to, including removal of condoms without consent.

Issues

Whether the conduct alleged in the Swedish proceedings would constitute offences under English law, and the scope of consent in sexual activity where conditions of consent are allegedly breached.

Held

The Divisional Court dismissed Assange's appeal against extradition. The alleged conduct would constitute sexual offences under English law if proved.

Significance

While primarily an extradition case, this decision influenced understanding of conditional consent and deceptive conduct in sexual relationships. It contributed to evolving jurisprudence on the boundaries of sexual consent in English law.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of R v Assange. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

R v Assange [2011] EWHC 2849 (Admin)

Criminal LawExtradition LawSexual OffencesConsentEuropean Arrest Warrant

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLB

More Criminal cases

R v Reece Martin Kelly

[2026] EWCA Crim 268

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.