Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Transcribed from the official recording by eScribers Ltd Ludgate House, 107-111 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AB Tel: 0330 100 5223 | Email: [email protected] | uk.escribers.net
MR P DODGE (instructed by The Specter Partnership) appeared on behalf of the Claimants MR J KIRK KC and MR G SPENCE-JONES (instructed by Caytons LLP) appeared on behalf of the Defendant (Hearing) MR R ROBERTS (instructed by Caytons LLP) appeared on behalf of the Defendant (Judgment) Written submissions: 16th January 2026 HEARING: 3rd December 2025 ____________________
This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.
(1) A professional negligence claim primarily on the basis the defendant did not properly protect the claimants from the risks and losses of the project. I need say no more as to that as that is not relevant to what I am to determine.
(2) An action for breach of statutory duty under the FSMA regulatory regime in that the claimants' allege:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.