What is the ratio in Strong v Bird?

An imperfect inter vivos gift can be perfected when the intended donee becomes executor, provided the donor's intention to give continued until death.

What did the court decide in Strong v Bird?

The court held that Strong's appointment as executor perfected the imperfect gift of debt forgiveness because his stepmother's intention continued until death.

Why is Strong v Bird important for equity law?

It creates an important exception to the rule that equity won't perfect imperfect gifts, preventing unconscionable results in estate administration.

What is the ratio in Strong v Bird?

An imperfect inter vivos gift can be perfected when the intended donee becomes executor, provided the donor's intention to give continued until death.

What did the court decide in Strong v Bird?

The court held that Strong's appointment as executor perfected the imperfect gift of debt forgiveness because his stepmother's intention continued until death.

Why is Strong v Bird important for equity law?

It creates an important exception to the rule that equity won't perfect imperfect gifts, preventing unconscionable results in estate administration.

Equity & Trusts1 min read

Strong v Bird

(1874) LR 18 Eq 315Court of Chancery1874

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Equity & Trusts cases →

“Imperfect gifts can be perfected when donee becomes donor's executor”

Facts

Bird was the stepson of a testatrix who had intended to forgive a debt he owed her and give him certain property during her lifetime, but failed to complete the legal formalities required. Upon her death, Bird became her executor under her will.

Issues

Whether an imperfect gift could be perfected where the intended donee subsequently becomes the executor of the donor's estate.

Held

The court held that the imperfect gift was perfected by Bird's appointment as executor, as the legal estate vested in him by virtue of his office.

Significance

This case established the 'rule in Strong v Bird' - a fundamental principle in equity allowing imperfect gifts to be perfected in specific circumstances. It remains a cornerstone of the law relating to imperfect gifts and donatio mortis causa.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of Strong v Bird. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

Strong v Bird (1874) LR 18 Eq 315 (Ch)

EquityTrustsGiftsWills and Probate

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLBGDL

More Equity & Trusts cases

Yiannakis Chambi v Aristos Aristodemou & Anor

[2026] EWHC 599 (Ch)

Louise Mary Harris & Anor v Neil Quantick & Anor

[2026] EWHC 137 (Ch)

Amaal Ventures Ltd & Anor v Eros Ltd

[2026] EWHC Ch 870

Jonathan Frank Bown v Clive Shipley & Anor

[2026] EWHC 918 (Ch)

Bhattacharya & Anor v Robert Armstrong & Anor

[2026] EWHC Ch 759

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

[2026] EWHC 853 (Ch)

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.