What is the ratio in R v Steer?

For aggravated criminal damage, life must be endangered by damage to property, not by the act of causing damage or the instrument used to cause it.

What did the court decide in R v Steer?

The House of Lords quashed the conviction, holding that firing bullets at property didn't satisfy the requirement that life be endangered by damaged property.

Why is R v Steer important for criminal damage law?

It provides authoritative interpretation of s.1(2) Criminal Damage Act 1971 and clarifies the distinction between endangerment by damage versus endangerment by the damaging act.

What is the ratio in R v Steer?

For aggravated criminal damage, life must be endangered by damage to property, not by the act of causing damage or the instrument used to cause it.

What did the court decide in R v Steer?

The House of Lords quashed the conviction, holding that firing bullets at property didn't satisfy the requirement that life be endangered by damaged property.

Why is R v Steer important for criminal damage law?

It provides authoritative interpretation of s.1(2) Criminal Damage Act 1971 and clarifies the distinction between endangerment by damage versus endangerment by the damaging act.

Criminal1 min read

R v Steer

[1988] AC 111House of Lords1988

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

“Reckless criminal damage requires risk to property beyond the damaging instrument itself.”

Facts

Steer fired rifle shots at his former business partner's house windows during a domestic dispute. He was charged with reckless criminal damage, with the prosecution arguing he was reckless as to whether life would be endangered.

Issues

Whether firing a rifle at property could constitute reckless criminal damage where the only risk to life came from the instrument of damage itself (the bullet).

Held

The House of Lords quashed Steer's conviction, holding that the Criminal Damage Act 1971 required risk to property other than the damaging instrument.

Significance

This case provides crucial interpretation of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 and the meaning of recklessness in property offences. It demonstrates the importance of precise statutory interpretation and limits the scope of aggravated criminal damage charges.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of R v Steer. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

R v Steer [1988] AC 111 (HL)

Criminal LawCriminal DamageRecklessnessStatutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLBGDL

More Criminal cases

R v Reece Martin Kelly

[2026] EWCA Crim 268

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.