“Malicious acts against neighbours can constitute nuisance despite being otherwise lawful.”
The claimant operated a silver fox farm where the animals bred during specific seasons. The defendant neighbour deliberately discharged guns near the boundary during the breeding season to disrupt the foxes out of spite, causing the vixens to refuse to breed and killing their young.
Whether acts that would normally be lawful on one's own land can constitute a nuisance when done with malicious intent to harm a neighbour's business.
The court held in favour of the claimant fox farmers, finding that the defendant's malicious conduct constituted an actionable nuisance.
This case establishes the important principle that malicious intent can transform otherwise lawful activities into tortious conduct. It demonstrates how the law of nuisance considers not just the act itself but the motivation behind it, making it essential study for understanding nuisance law.
You're reading the free summary of Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
OSCOLA Citation
Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.