What is the ratio in Dingle v Turner?

The ratio is that trusts for the relief of poverty can benefit a defined and even narrow class of beneficiaries while still maintaining charitable status, unlike other categories of charity which require broader public benefit.

What did the court decide in Dingle v Turner?

The House of Lords decided that a trust for poor employees of a specific company and their relatives was a valid charitable trust for the relief of poverty.

Why is Dingle v Turner important for charity law?

It establishes that poverty trusts are subject to different and more lenient rules regarding public benefit than other charitable purposes, allowing for more narrowly defined beneficiary classes.

What is the ratio in Dingle v Turner?

The ratio is that trusts for the relief of poverty can benefit a defined and even narrow class of beneficiaries while still maintaining charitable status, unlike other categories of charity which require broader public benefit.

What did the court decide in Dingle v Turner?

The House of Lords decided that a trust for poor employees of a specific company and their relatives was a valid charitable trust for the relief of poverty.

Why is Dingle v Turner important for charity law?

It establishes that poverty trusts are subject to different and more lenient rules regarding public benefit than other charitable purposes, allowing for more narrowly defined beneficiary classes.

Equity & Trusts1 min read

Dingle v Turner

[1972] AC 601House of Lords1972

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Equity & Trusts cases →

“Poverty trusts can benefit defined classes and remain charitable despite personal connections.”

Facts

A trust was established for poor employees of a specific company (E. Dingle & Co Ltd) and their relatives. The issue was whether this constituted a valid charitable trust given the apparently narrow and private nature of the beneficiary class.

Issues

Whether a trust for the relief of poverty among a defined class of people (employees and their relatives) could constitute a valid charitable trust or whether it was too narrowly defined to be charitable.

Held

The House of Lords held that the trust was charitable. Poverty trusts are subject to different rules from other charitable purposes and can benefit defined classes while remaining charitable.

Significance

This case is crucial for understanding the different requirements across charitable purposes, particularly the more relaxed approach to public benefit in poverty cases. It remains important for practitioners drafting charitable trusts and for understanding the boundaries of charitable purposes.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of Dingle v Turner. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

Dingle v Turner [1972] AC 601 (HL)

Equity and TrustsCharity LawRelief of PovertyPublic Benefit

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLBGDL

More Equity & Trusts cases

Yiannakis Chambi v Aristos Aristodemou & Anor

[2026] EWHC 599 (Ch)

Louise Mary Harris & Anor v Neil Quantick & Anor

[2026] EWHC 137 (Ch)

Amaal Ventures Ltd & Anor v Eros Ltd

[2026] EWHC Ch 870

Jonathan Frank Bown v Clive Shipley & Anor

[2026] EWHC 918 (Ch)

Bhattacharya & Anor v Robert Armstrong & Anor

[2026] EWHC Ch 759

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

[2026] EWHC 853 (Ch)

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.