Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited Trading as DTI Global 165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr Jonathan Dingle (instructed by Parker Bullen) appeared on behalf of the Claimant Mr James Chegwidden (instructed by Government Legal Department) appeared on behalf of the Defendant ____________________
Nonetheless he concluded that the procedures could not be categorised as inadequate so as to violate the common law standard of rationality. In short, in determining what other factors might be taken into account, he adopted both an exacting standard in assessing any such violation, and a wide margin of discretion.
MR JUSTICE LANGSTAFF: For those reasons, this appeal, attractively presented though it has been, must be, and is, dismissed.
MR CHEGWIDDEN: I am grateful. The only application is an application for the defendant's costs of this judicial review. I trust that I do not need to make submissions on "costs follow the event" principle. There is a schedule on costs which has been exchanged. I appreciate that it is in a sum which is higher than would ordinarily take place.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2025] UKUT 168 (AAC)
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.