What is the ratio in T Choithram v Pagarani?

A settlor can validly constitute a trust by declaring himself a trustee for the beneficiaries, even where he intended other co-trustees to hold the property jointly but dies before the transfer.

What did the court decide in T Choithram v Pagarani?

The Privy Council held that the charitable trust was validly constituted because TCP had declared himself a trustee, which was sufficient despite not transferring to co-trustees.

Why is T Choithram v Pagarani important for equity and trusts?

It establishes a crucial exception to the strict rules on trust constitution and shows that equity prioritizes the settlor's clear intention over rigid formalistic requirements.

What is the ratio in T Choithram v Pagarani?

A settlor can validly constitute a trust by declaring himself a trustee for the beneficiaries, even where he intended other co-trustees to hold the property jointly but dies before the transfer.

What did the court decide in T Choithram v Pagarani?

The Privy Council held that the charitable trust was validly constituted because TCP had declared himself a trustee, which was sufficient despite not transferring to co-trustees.

Why is T Choithram v Pagarani important for equity and trusts?

It establishes a crucial exception to the strict rules on trust constitution and shows that equity prioritizes the settlor's clear intention over rigid formalistic requirements.

Equity & Trusts1 min read

T Choithram v Pagarani

[2001] 1 WLR 1Privy Council2001

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Equity & Trusts cases →

“Privy Council confirms donor can validly declare himself trustee without separate transfer”

Facts

TCP, a wealthy businessman, executed a trust deed establishing a foundation and purported to give his wealth to it. He appointed trustees including himself but died before formally transferring legal title to all the trust property to the trustees.

Issues

Whether a valid trust was created where the donor declared himself trustee but died before completing transfer of legal title to all trustees

Held

The Privy Council held that a valid trust had been created. Where a donor declares himself trustee, this constitutes the trust without need for further transfer.

Significance

This case provides important clarification on the constitution of trusts, particularly where settlors name themselves as trustees. It ensures that technical formalities do not defeat clear intentions to create trusts.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of T Choithram v Pagarani. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

T Choithram International SA v Pagarani [2001] 1 WLR 1 (PC)

TrustsEquity

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLBGDL

More Equity & Trusts cases

Yiannakis Chambi v Aristos Aristodemou & Anor

[2026] EWHC 599 (Ch)

Louise Mary Harris & Anor v Neil Quantick & Anor

[2026] EWHC 137 (Ch)

Amaal Ventures Ltd & Anor v Eros Ltd

[2026] EWHC Ch 870

Jonathan Frank Bown v Clive Shipley & Anor

[2026] EWHC 918 (Ch)

Bhattacharya & Anor v Robert Armstrong & Anor

[2026] EWHC Ch 759

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

[2026] EWHC 853 (Ch)

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.