What is the ratio in Barnes v Addy?

Third parties can be liable for breach of trust through either dishonest assistance in the breach or knowing receipt of trust property.

What did the court decide in Barnes v Addy?

The Court of Appeal established the two-limb test for third party liability, extending responsibility beyond trustees to dishonest assisters and knowing recipients.

Why is Barnes v Addy important for trusts law?

It created the foundational framework for third party liability that still governs how equity protects trust property from outsider involvement in breaches.

What is the ratio in Barnes v Addy?

Third parties can be liable for breach of trust through either dishonest assistance in the breach or knowing receipt of trust property.

What did the court decide in Barnes v Addy?

The Court of Appeal established the two-limb test for third party liability, extending responsibility beyond trustees to dishonest assisters and knowing recipients.

Why is Barnes v Addy important for trusts law?

It created the foundational framework for third party liability that still governs how equity protects trust property from outsider involvement in breaches.

Equity & Trusts1 min read

Barnes v Addy

(1874) LR 9 Ch App 244Court of Chancery1874

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Equity & Trusts cases →

“Third parties liable for breach of trust through dishonest assistance or knowing receipt”

Facts

Trustees improperly applied trust funds with the assistance of a solicitor. The beneficiaries sought to make the solicitor personally liable for the breach of trust despite him not being a trustee.

Issues

Whether and when a third party who is not a trustee can be held liable for assisting in or receiving the proceeds of a breach of trust

Held

The Court of Appeal held that third parties could be liable under two distinct heads: dishonest assistance in breach of trust and knowing receipt of trust property

Significance

This case established the foundational framework for third party liability in trust law, creating the Barnes v Addy liability categories still used today. It's essential for understanding how equity protects trust property beyond direct trustee liability.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of Barnes v Addy. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244

breach of trustthird party liabilityaccessory liabilityequity and trustsknowing receiptdishonest assistance

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLBGDL

More Equity & Trusts cases

Yiannakis Chambi v Aristos Aristodemou & Anor

[2026] EWHC 599 (Ch)

Louise Mary Harris & Anor v Neil Quantick & Anor

[2026] EWHC 137 (Ch)

Amaal Ventures Ltd & Anor v Eros Ltd

[2026] EWHC Ch 870

Jonathan Frank Bown v Clive Shipley & Anor

[2026] EWHC 918 (Ch)

Bhattacharya & Anor v Robert Armstrong & Anor

[2026] EWHC Ch 759

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

[2026] EWHC 853 (Ch)

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.