What is the ratio in R v Nedrick?

Intent for murder may be found where death or serious bodily harm was virtually certain to result from the defendant's act and the defendant realised this virtual certainty.

What did the court decide in R v Nedrick?

The Court of Appeal established the 'virtual certainty' test for oblique intent and quashed the murder conviction, substituting manslaughter due to inadequate jury direction.

Why is R v Nedrick important for murder law?

It provides the leading test for establishing intent in murder cases where killing was not the defendant's primary purpose but was a virtually certain consequence of their actions.

What is the ratio in R v Nedrick?

Intent for murder may be found where death or serious bodily harm was virtually certain to result from the defendant's act and the defendant realised this virtual certainty.

What did the court decide in R v Nedrick?

The Court of Appeal established the 'virtual certainty' test for oblique intent and quashed the murder conviction, substituting manslaughter due to inadequate jury direction.

Why is R v Nedrick important for murder law?

It provides the leading test for establishing intent in murder cases where killing was not the defendant's primary purpose but was a virtually certain consequence of their actions.

Criminal1 min read

R v Nedrick

[1986] 1 WLR 1025Court of Appeal1986

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

“Court of Appeal establishes 'virtual certainty' test for criminal intention”

Facts

Nedrick poured paraffin through the letterbox of a woman's house and set it alight, killing a child inside. He claimed he only intended to frighten the woman, not to kill or cause serious harm to anyone.

Issues

What is the appropriate test for establishing intention in murder cases, particularly where the defendant claims they did not intend the fatal consequences of their actions?

Held

The conviction for murder was quashed and a conviction for manslaughter substituted. The court established that intention can be inferred where death or serious bodily harm was a virtual certainty from the defendant's act and the defendant appreciated this.

Significance

This case established the leading test for inferring intention in serious criminal cases, providing crucial guidance for murder prosecutions where defendants claim lack of intent.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of R v Nedrick. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

R v Nedrick [1986] 1 WLR 1025 (CA)

Criminal LawHomicideMens Rea

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLBGDL

More Criminal cases

R v Reece Martin Kelly

[2026] EWCA Crim 268

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.