What is the ratio in R v Latimer?

The doctrine of transferred malice allows a defendant's criminal intent toward one victim to transfer to an accidentally harmed victim, provided both offences are of the same type.

What did the court decide in R v Latimer?

Latimer was convicted because his malicious intent to harm his original target transferred to the woman he accidentally struck.

Why is R v Latimer important for criminal law?

It established transferred malice as a key doctrine ensuring defendants cannot escape liability when they accidentally harm unintended victims while committing crimes.

What is the ratio in R v Latimer?

The doctrine of transferred malice allows a defendant's criminal intent toward one victim to transfer to an accidentally harmed victim, provided both offences are of the same type.

What did the court decide in R v Latimer?

Latimer was convicted because his malicious intent to harm his original target transferred to the woman he accidentally struck.

Why is R v Latimer important for criminal law?

It established transferred malice as a key doctrine ensuring defendants cannot escape liability when they accidentally harm unintended victims while committing crimes.

Criminal1 min read

R v Latimer

(1886) 17 QBD 359Queen's Bench Division1886

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

“Transferred malice doctrine established when defendant injures unintended victim”

Facts

Latimer aimed a belt at a man in a public house following an argument. The belt struck the intended victim lightly but rebounded and severely injured a woman standing nearby. Latimer was charged with maliciously wounding the woman.

Issues

Whether a defendant can be criminally liable for maliciously wounding a person when his malicious intent was directed at someone else entirely.

Held

The defendant was guilty of maliciously wounding the woman. The malicious intent directed toward the original target could be transferred to establish liability for the harm actually caused to the unintended victim.

Significance

This case established the fundamental doctrine of transferred malice, which remains a cornerstone principle in English criminal law for determining liability when defendants harm unintended victims.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of R v Latimer. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

R v Latimer (1886) 17 QBD 359

Criminal LawAssault and BatteryMalicious Wounding

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLBGDLSQE1

More Criminal cases

R v Reece Martin Kelly

[2026] EWCA Crim 268

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.