Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Christopher Parker KC, James Davies, Zachary Kell (instructed by Gateley Plc) for the Claimant Jasbir Dhillon KC, Jonathan Dawid (instructed by Gardner Leader) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 20 February 2026 ____________________
(a) Amendments designed to plead and rely upon the evidence of the ADs' forensic accountancy expert Mr Thompson, served on 10 December 2025 (see paragraphs 157A.7.2 and 199).
(b) Amendments designed to respond to a new case advanced by the Claimants in their CRRRAPOC about the evidence to be found in what are referred to as the Sharjah Court's Expert Reports (see paragraphs 157C.5 and 157C.5.3).
(c) Amendments designed to alter the ADs' case as to the mechanics of the initial stages of the alleged fraud, whether gold drawn down by Winsome and Forever Precious under the Precious Metals Facilities (" PMFs ") was transferred to Emirates Gold, and whether payments from Emirates Gold to Al Mufied can be regarded as the traceable proceeds of that gold (see paragraphs 71.3, 71.5, 157C.1, 157C.5.4, 158.1.3, 159, 162.1, 164.1.1, 180.1A, 202A.1 and 210A(i)).
"In proceedings brought by Winsome and Forever Precious against the UAE Distributor Companies before the Sharjah Federal Court of First Instance, expert reports show that Winsome and Forever Precious sold gold, jewellery and diamonds to the UAE Distributor Companies between 18 April 2012 and 21 March 2013 with a price of approximately USD 1.26 billion".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.