Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
ANDREW LOMAS (instructed by Eversheds Sutherland) for the Claimants JONATHAN HILL (instructed by Kuits) for the Defendant Hearing date: 23 January 2026 ____________________
(i) breached a written supply agreement dated 23 February 2010 ( 2010 Agreement ), principally by selling certain V-Series Products ( Contested Products ) to third party customers in breach of the exclusivity provision in the 2010 Agreement;
(ii) infringed copyright in various works relating to those products and design right in their printed circuit board designs; and
(iii) as a result, Nortek had caused the Claimants to incur loss in an amount then quantified at approximately �11.8 million.
(i) The Claimants' argument that TES was the sole legal owner of any copyright works and unregistered design right in the V-Series Products based on the contractual assignment of those rights pursuant to the 2010 Agreement. Nortek argued, in turn, that this was unsustainable, whether as a matter of proper construction of the express terms or on the basis of the related implied terms asserted by the Claimants ( Construction Issue );
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.