What is the ratio in R v Vickers?

Malice aforethought for murder includes not only intent to kill but also intent to cause grievous bodily harm.

What did the court decide in R v Vickers?

The Court of Appeal upheld the murder conviction, establishing that intent to cause GBH is sufficient mens rea for murder.

Why is R v Vickers important for criminal law?

It established one of the two limbs of malice aforethought, fundamental to understanding the mens rea requirement for murder.

What is the ratio in R v Vickers?

Malice aforethought for murder includes not only intent to kill but also intent to cause grievous bodily harm.

What did the court decide in R v Vickers?

The Court of Appeal upheld the murder conviction, establishing that intent to cause GBH is sufficient mens rea for murder.

Why is R v Vickers important for criminal law?

It established one of the two limbs of malice aforethought, fundamental to understanding the mens rea requirement for murder.

Criminal1 min read

R v Vickers

[1957] 2 QB 664Court of Criminal Appeal1957

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Criminal cases →

“Intention to cause grievous bodily harm sufficient for murder conviction”

Facts

Vickers broke into a shop intending to steal and was confronted by the elderly female shopkeeper. He struck her several times, causing injuries from which she later died. Vickers claimed he only intended to silence her and had no intention to kill.

Issues

Whether an intention to cause grievous bodily harm, without a specific intention to kill, is sufficient mens rea for a conviction of murder.

Held

The Court of Criminal Appeal upheld the murder conviction, confirming that malice aforethought includes an intention to cause grievous bodily harm, which is sufficient mens rea for murder.

Significance

This case definitively established the dual limb test for the mens rea of murder in English law, confirming that either intention to kill or intention to cause grievous bodily harm suffices for a murder conviction.

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of R v Vickers. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

OSCOLA Citation

R v Vickers [1957] 2 QB 664 (CA)

Criminal LawHomicide

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

LLBGDLSQE1

More Criminal cases

R v Reece Martin Kelly

[2026] EWCA Crim 268

R v Richard Alexander Welsh

[2026] EWCA Crim 466

R v Robert Michael Thomas

[2026] EWCA Crim 305

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.