Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Andrew Carter (instructed by Longmores Solicitors) for the Applicants Ms Rachel Sleeman (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) for the Respondents Hearing date: 18 December 2025 (and further written submissions on 18 March 2026) ____________________
64.5.2. she was not a shareholder of the company that seems to have owned the Hotel until July 2020, well after its sale, and she currently holds only a 13% interest; she appears, even now, to be unaware of ever having been a shareholder;
64.5.3. there was very little � and indeed, nothing at all from Mr or Mrs Bhattacharya � to support the suggestion that the Applicants were each somehow entitled to payment of �100,000 from the sale of The French Partridge Hotel, or that they were treated as having been paid that sum; the suggestion was really no more than a bare assertion;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.