What is the ratio in Jones v Kernott?

Courts can impute common intention regarding quantification of beneficial interests when inference from conduct is impossible, based on what is fair considering the whole course of dealing.

What did the court decide in Jones v Kernott?

The Supreme Court ruled that Jones held a 90% beneficial interest, establishing that courts can impute intention for fair quantification of property shares.

Why is Jones v Kernott important for land law?

It clarifies when courts can move beyond inferring intention to imputing it, providing greater flexibility for fair outcomes in unmarried couples' property disputes.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library