Contract

Gatwick Investment Ltd and others v Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE; Bath Racecourse Company Ltd and others v Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE and others

[2026] UKSC 14United Kingdom Supreme Court2026

Cite this case in OSCOLA →All Contract cases →

“Savings clauses in business interruption policies do not reduce claims by furlough scheme payments”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of Gatwick Investment Ltd and others v Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE; Bath Racecourse Company Ltd and others v Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE and others. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Contract cases

Providence Building Services Limited v Hexagon Housing Association Limited

[2026] UKSC 1

Hopcraft and another v Close Brothers Limited; Johnson v FirstRand Bank Limited (London Branch) t/a MotoNovo Finance; Wrench v FirstRand Bank Limited (London Branch) t/a MotoNovo Finance

[2025] UKSC 33

King Crude Carriers SA and others v Ridgebury November LLC and others

[2025] UKSC 39

Times Travel UK v Pakistan International Airlines

[2021] UKSC 40

MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd

[2018] UKSC 24

Wood v Capita Insurance Services

[2017] UKSC 24

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.