Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Respect for private life • Unlawful domestic law provisions for enhanced police checks in the absence of adequate safeguards • No real restrictions or review of executive�s issuing of authorisation for enhanced checks, nor of police measures carried out during an enhanced check
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Ksenija Turković, President, ��������� Krzysztof Wojtyczek, ��������� Alena Pol�čkov�, ��������� P�ter Paczolay, ��������� Gilberto Felici, ��������� Erik Wennerstr�m, ��������� Raffaele Sabato, judges, and Abel Campos, Section Registrar,
the application against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Hungarian national, Mr D�vid Vig (�the applicant�), on 16 September 2013;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.