Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Jovan Ilievski , President , ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, ��������� Diana S�rcu , judges , and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 1836/16) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on 28 December 2015 by a Moldovan national, Ms Svetlana Ouş, (�the applicant�) who was born in 1966 and lives in Chișinău, represented by Mr I. Levinte, a lawyer practising in Chișinău;
the decision to give notice of the application to the Moldovan Government (�the Government�), represented by their Agent, Mr O. Rotari;
1.  The case concerns the applicant�s complaints that she had been deprived of her property in violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and that the domestic civil proceedings had been conducted in breach of the requirements of Articles 6 of the Convention as the domestic courts had upheld a time‑barred court action in which the applicant was defendant.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.