Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Jovan Ilievski , President , ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, ��������� Diana S�rcu , judges , and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 1836/16) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on 28 December 2015 by a Moldovan national, Ms Svetlana Ouş, (�the applicant�) who was born in 1966 and lives in Chișinău, represented by Mr I. Levinte, a lawyer practising in Chișinău;
the decision to give notice of the application to the Moldovan Government (�the Government�), represented by their Agent, Mr O. Rotari;
1.  The case concerns the applicant�s complaints that she had been deprived of her property in violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and that the domestic civil proceedings had been conducted in breach of the requirements of Articles 6 of the Convention as the domestic courts had upheld a time‑barred court action in which the applicant was defendant.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.