Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Non-contractual liability – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Energy efficiency – Measurement method – Annulment by the General Court – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)
Dyson Ltd, established in Malmesbury (United Kingdom), and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex, ( 1 ) represented by E. Batchelor, T. Selwyn Sharpe and M. Healy, Solicitors,
European Commission, represented by J.‑F. Brakeland, Y. Marinova and K. Talabér‑Ritz, acting as Agents,
APPLICATION based on Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the unlawfulness of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 of 3 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of vacuum cleaners (OJ 2013 L 192, p. 1),
composed of R. da Silva Passos, President, V. Valančius and M. Sampol Pucurull (Rapporteur), Judges,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.