Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Valeriu Griţco, President, ��������� Branko Lubarda, ��������� Pauliine Koskelo, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case concerns the applicant�s inability to be present before the appeal court examining his objection and the non-communication of the public prosecutor�s written opinion, as well as the right to compensation under domestic law in respect of these complaints.
The case originated in an application (no. 62657/12 ) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Turkish national, Mr. Cengiz Okuyucu (�the applicant�), on 11 September 2012.
The applicant was represented by Mr H. Boğatekin, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.