Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Valeriu Griţco, President, ��������� Branko Lubarda, ��������� Pauliine Koskelo, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case concerns the applicant�s inability to be present before the appeal court examining his objection and the non-communication of the public prosecutor�s written opinion, as well as the right to compensation under domestic law in respect of these complaints.
The case originated in an application (no. 62657/12 ) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Turkish national, Mr. Cengiz Okuyucu (�the applicant�), on 11 September 2012.
The applicant was represented by Mr H. Boğatekin, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.