Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 6 � 1 (civil) • Fair hearing and adversarial trial • Requalification of the applicant�s claim by the Court of Appeal • No clear reasons for requalification and no subsequent opportunity for applicant to submit evidence and relevant arguments
Art 1 P1 • Peaceful enjoyment of possessions • Applicant entitled to request a rehearing under domestic law in light of the Court�s finding under Art 6 � 1 • No need to separately examine the complaint
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� S�ofra O�Leary, President, ��������� Ganna Yudkivska, ��������� Jovan Ilievski, ��������� Lado Chanturia, ��������� Ivana Jelić, ��������� Arnfinn B�rdsen, ��������� Mattias Guyomar, judges, and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.