Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Appeal – Action for annulment – State aid – Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link – Individual aid – Notified aid declared compatible with the internal market – Execution of an important project of common European interest – Decision not to raise any objections – Monopoly – Distortion of competition and effect on trade)
TWO APPEALS under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 25 February 2019,
Aktionsbündnis gegen eine feste Fehmarnbeltquerung eV, established in Fehmarn (Germany), represented by L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat, and W. Mecklenburg, Rechtsanwalt,
Rederi Nordö-Link AB, established in Malmö (Sweden), represented by L. Sandberg-Mørch and A. Godsk Fallesen, advokater,
Trelleborg Hamn AB, established in Trelleborg (Sweden), represented by L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat, and J.L. Buendía Sierra, abogado,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.