Skip to main content

Search Case Library Notes Exams Flashcards Quizzes Past Papers SQE

Home›Case Library›Hersi & Co Solicitors, R (On the Application Of) v The Lord Chancellor

Construction

Hersi & Co Solicitors, R (On the Application Of) v The Lord Chancellor

[2017] EWHC TCC 2667High Court (Technology & Construction)2017

Cite this case in OSCOLA →

No checked summary yet

We don't have a checked summary of this case yet, and we won't let AI guess one. Read the judgment on the official record instead.

Full judgment

Read the judgment for Hersi & Co Solicitors, R (On the Application Of) v The Lord Chancellor as published by The National Archives (Find Case Law).

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

Official
Read on National Archives
Official UK government case law repository
Mirror
Read on BAILII
British and Irish Legal Information Institute
Web
Find via Google
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately

Read next in Construction

Mak Systems Group Limited v Velindre University NHS Trust

[2026] EWHC 8 (TCC)

5 more related cases below

More Construction cases

Mak Systems Group Limited v Velindre University NHS Trust

[2026] EWHC 8 (TCC)

MJS Projects (March) Limited V RPS Consulting Services Limited

[2026] EWHC 884 (TCC)

Crestline Direct Finance LP v Insurance Company Euroins AD

[2026] EWHC 423 (TCC)

CR Construction (UK) Limited v Barclays Bank PLC (Costs and Stay)

[2026] EWHC 228 (TCC)

UK Global Healthcare Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

[2026] EWHC TCC 561

Crestline Direct Finance LP v Insurance Company Euroins AD

[2026] EWHC TCC 423

Exam & revision prep

LNAT preparation

FE1 (Ireland) prep

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

Log in to comment. Discussions are part of the Common Room.

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

Judgment text on this page comes from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the Open Justice Licence v2.0. Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Case briefs are written with AI help and only shown here once checked against the judgment. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

caselaw

AI-generated briefs should be verified against the source judgment. This tool is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

[email protected]

StudyCase Library Browse A–Z Notes Flashcards Quizzes Past Papers Practice exams Verify with Quill LNAT Guides Blog Topics Landmarks Doctrines

ToolsAll tools OSCOLA Case Finder Verify with Quill Glossary Statutes Court hierarchy LLB SQE1 Oxford BA By university

CaselawAbout Methodology Code of ethics How it works Pricing For universities For law firms FAQ Changelog Contact Press

TrustSecurity Accessibility Status Terms Privacy Acceptable use Refunds Sign up

JurisdictionsCanada United States Ireland Australia New Zealand Hong Kong Singapore South Africa

Used by Oxford law students·Powered by Anthropic AI·Cases from The National Archives·Payments by Stripe·GDPR Compliant

SQE revision content is produced by Caselaw independently and is not official SQE material. Caselaw is not affiliated with or endorsed by the SRA, Kaplan, or any official SQE provider. Refunds · Terms

© 2026 GetCaseLaw Limited. All rights reserved.
GetCaseLaw Limited is registered in England and Wales, company number 17307882. Registered office: 25 Marbaix Gardens, Isleworth, TW7 4FD, United Kingdom.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the University of Oxford or any other university. Practice papers and notes are written by Caselaw.