Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Family life • Severe limitations on parents� contact rights, following their child�s placement in foster care, at variance with aim of family reunification • Failure to examine existence of any other alternative arrangement to avoid permanent foster care
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� S�ofra O�Leary, President, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� Ganna Yudkivska, ��������� Lətif H�seynov, ��������� Lado Chanturia, ��������� Mattias Guyomar, judges, ��������� Anne Gr�stad, ad hoc judge, and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 45889/18) against the Kingdom of Norway lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Slovak national, Mr A.L., a Norwegian national, Ms S.M., a Norwegian national, X, and a Slovak national, Ms J.L. (�the applicants�), on 19 September 2018;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.