Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 1 P1 • Peaceful enjoyment of possessions • Refusal by domestic authorities to grant survivor's pension to applicants due to unforeseeable retrospective application of a new eligibility requirement • Impugned measures placing excessive burden on applicants • Unjustified absence of transitionary period for legislative change • Fair balance between competing interests not struck
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Georges Ravarani , President , Carlo Ranzoni, Mārtiņš Mits, María Elósegui, Mattias Guyomar, Kateřina Šimáčková, Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar,
the applications (nos. 32667/19 and 30807/20 ) against the Kingdom of Spain lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by two Spanish nationals, Ms Mercè Domenech Aradilla and Ms Encarnación Rodríguez González ("the applicants"), on the dates indicated in the appended table;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.