Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Egidijus Kūris, President, ��������� Pauliine Koskelo, ��������� Gilberto Felici, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 72968/14) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on 9 November 2014 by a company registered in Moldova, Gospodăria Ţărănească �Alcaz G.A.�, (�the applicant�) which was represented by Mr I. Coban, a lawyer practising in Chișinău;
the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention to the Moldovan Government (�the Government�), represented by their Agent, Mr O. Rotari, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application;
1.  The case concerns the deprivation of the applicant�s right to deduct the VAT it had paid on received goods because its supplier�s VAT registration had been cancelled.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.