Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Egidijus Kūris, President, ��������� Pauliine Koskelo, ��������� Gilberto Felici, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 72968/14) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on 9 November 2014 by a company registered in Moldova, Gospodăria Ţărănească �Alcaz G.A.�, (�the applicant�) which was represented by Mr I. Coban, a lawyer practising in Chișinău;
the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention to the Moldovan Government (�the Government�), represented by their Agent, Mr O. Rotari, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application;
1.  The case concerns the deprivation of the applicant�s right to deduct the VAT it had paid on received goods because its supplier�s VAT registration had been cancelled.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.