Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Family life applicable • Non-recognition of parental link with non-biological child born abroad via surrogacy, while preserving bond through foster care • Fair balance struck between family life and general interests protected by ban on surrogacy
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Paul Lemmens, President, ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Robert Spano, ��������� Georges Ravarani, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Darian Pavli, ��������� Anja Seibert-Fohr, judges,
the application (no. 71552/17 ) against the Republic of Iceland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by three Icelandic nationals, Ms Vald�s Gl�d�s Fj�lnisd�ttir (�the first applicant�), Ms Eyd�s R�s Gl�d�s Agnarsd�ttir (�the second applicant�) and Mr X (�the third applicant�), on 25 September 2017;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.