Tax

Cascade Care Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT - Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sch 9 (Exemptions) Group 7 (Health and welfare) item 9 - statutory interpretation - Inco Europe Ltd - Marleasing - fiscal neutrality)

[2025] UKFTT TC TC09680First-tier Tribunal (Tax)2025

No checked summary yet

We don't have a checked summary of this case yet, and we won't let AI guess one. Read the judgment on the official record instead.

Full judgment

Read the judgment for Cascade Care Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT - Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sch 9 (Exemptions) Group 7 (Health and welfare) item 9 - statutory interpretation - Inco Europe Ltd - Marleasing - fiscal neutrality) as published by The National Archives (Find Case Law).

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

Lawrence Rawlinson v The Commissioners for HMRC

[2026] UKFTT 45 (TC)

5 more related cases below

More Tax cases

Lawrence Rawlinson v The Commissioners for HMRC

[2026] UKFTT 45 (TC)

COMFG Holdings Ltd v Welsh Revenue Authority / Awdurdod Cyllid Cymru

[2026] UKFTT 237 (TC)

Jeremy John Hosking v The Commissioners for HMRC

[2026] UKFTT 406 (TC)

Robert Huish v The Commissioners for HMRC

[2026] UKFTT 129 (TC)

The Khan Partnership LLP v Revenue and Customs

[2026] UKFTT TC 43

Transwaste Recycling and Aggregates Ltd & Anor v Revenue and Customs (VAT - Kittel - supply of services by waste brokers and a haulier - denial of input tax - knew or should have known)

[2026] UKFTT TC 515

Exam & revision prep

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

Judgment text on this page comes from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the Open Justice Licence v2.0. Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Case briefs are written with AI help and only shown here once checked against the judgment. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.