“Time stipulations in commercial contracts are presumptively conditions allowing termination for breach.”
The House of Lords held in favour of Tradax Export. The 15-day notice requirement was a condition, and Tradax was entitled to terminate the contract and recover damages for Bunge's breach.
Tradax Export agreed to sell US soya bean meal to Bunge Corporation, with shipment in June 1975. The contract required the buyers to give at least 15 consecutive days' notice of probable readiness of vessel. Bunge gave notice on 17 June 1975, roughly four days too late against the June shipment period. Tradax treated Bunge as in default and claimed damages on the fallen market.
Whether the 15-day notice provision was a condition (allowing termination) or warranty (allowing only damages), and whether Tradax was entitled to terminate for breach of this time stipulation.
The House of Lords established that in mercantile contracts, time stipulations are presumptively conditions unless the parties clearly intended otherwise. This presumption exists because certainty and predictability are essential in commercial dealings. The court applied the traditional approach that commercial parties need to know their rights immediately upon breach occurring.
This case is fundamental to understanding the classification of contractual terms in commercial law. It establishes the strong presumption that time clauses in commercial contracts are conditions, providing certainty for business transactions and allowing parties to plan their affairs with confidence.
Time stipulations in mercantile contracts are presumptively conditions rather than warranties, allowing the innocent party to terminate the contract upon breach.
The House of Lords held that Tradax was entitled to terminate the contract as the 15-day notice requirement was a condition, not a warranty.
It provides crucial guidance on classifying contractual terms in commercial contexts and emphasizes the importance of certainty in business dealings.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticLord Wilberforce commented on the general importance of treating time as of the essence in commercial contracts to maintain commercial certainty.
OSCOLA Citation
Bunge Corporation v Tradax Export [1981] 1 WLR 711 (HL)
Read the judgment for Bunge Corporation v Tradax Export as published by The National Archives (Find Case Law).
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2026] UKSC 1
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.