Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark K K WATER – Earlier EU figurative mark K – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by M. Eberl and D. Gája, acting as Agents,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being
Arne-Patrik Heinze, residing in Hamburg (Germany), represented by N. Dauskardt, lawyer,
composed, at the time of the deliberations, of A. Kornezov (Rapporteur), President, K. Kowalik-Bańczyk and D. Petrlík, Judges,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.