Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 13 (+ Art 6) • Lack of effective remedy in respect of length of proceedings in pending cases • Constitutional Court no longer dealing with such cases • Absence of any compensatory remedy rendered any acceleration of the civil proceedings by virtue of the applicant�s constitutional appeal ineffective
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Yonko Grozev, President, ��������� Tim Eicke, ��������� Faris Vehabović, ��������� Iulia Antoanella Motoc, ��������� Armen Harutyunyan, ��������� Pere Pastor Vilanova, ��������� Jolien Schukking, judges, and Andrea Tamietti, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 59181/18 ) against Bosnia and Herzegovina lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mr Sanel Delić (�the applicant�), on 6 December 2018 ;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.