Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� P�ter Paczolay, President, ��������� Raffaele Sabato, ��������� Davor Derenčinović, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Deputy Section Registrar,
the applications (no. 65808/13 , no. 58494/14 and no. 66370/14 ) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by the applicants listed in the appended table, (�the applicants�), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the applications to the Italian Government (�the Government�) represented by their former co-Agent, Ms P. Accardo;
1.  The case concerns legislative intervention in the course of ongoing civil proceedings. The applicants complained that the enactment of Law no. 296 of 27 December 2006 (�Law no. 296/2006�) had violated their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 � 1 of the Convention.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.