Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� P�ter Paczolay, President, ��������� Raffaele Sabato, ��������� Davor Derenčinović, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Deputy Section Registrar,
the applications (no. 65808/13 , no. 58494/14 and no. 66370/14 ) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by the applicants listed in the appended table, (�the applicants�), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the applications to the Italian Government (�the Government�) represented by their former co-Agent, Ms P. Accardo;
1.  The case concerns legislative intervention in the course of ongoing civil proceedings. The applicants complained that the enactment of Law no. 296 of 27 December 2006 (�Law no. 296/2006�) had violated their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 � 1 of the Convention.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.