Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VDL E-POWER – Earlier national figurative marks e-POWER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd, established in Yokohama-shi (Japan), represented by P. Martini-Berthon, lawyer,
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by V. Ruzek, acting as Agent,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court, being
VDL Groep BV, established in Eindhoven (Netherlands), represented by M. Rijks, lawyer,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.