Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 18 September 2019,
VodafoneZiggo Group BV, established in Utrecht (Netherlands), represented by W. Knibbeler, A. Pliego Selie and B. Verheijen, advocaten,
composed of E. Juhász, acting as President of the Chamber, C. Lycourgos and I. Jarukaitis (Rapporteur), Judges,
having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33), as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 (OJ 2009 L 337, p. 37, and corrigendum OJ 2013 L 241, p. 8) (‘the Framework Directive’), states, in recital 15:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.