Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              I have made an order to anonymise the Appellant. An anonymity order was made in the First-Tier Tribunal. Having considered Guidance note 2022 No 2: Anonymity Orders and Hearings in Private, it is my view that there is a need to protect the identity of the Appellant. This in the light of the fact that this is an asylum claim.
              The Appellant is a citizen of Vietnam, born in 1984.
              The issue to decide is whether the First-tier Tribunal ('FtT') Judge ('the Judge') Mulholland erred in law, in a decision dated 4 April 2025, when dismissing the Appellant's appeal against the decision of the Respondent, dated 29 August 2023, to refuse his claim on protection and human rights grounds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2026] UKAITUR UI2025005096
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.