Generate a structured brief โ facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance โ for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The appellant appeals against the decision ("the decision") of the First-tier Tribunal Judge ("the judge"), dated 10 April 2025, dismissing the appellant's appeal against the decision of the respondent of 30 January 2024, refusing his asylum and human rights claim.
             The respondent then refused the claim on the basis it was not consistent or credible and the documents attracted little weight. He had not submitted the originals, the person who was the subject of the court case had a different last name and the translations were not done in the UK.
             The judge hearing the case dismissed the appellant's appeal, largely on credibility grounds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress โ the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources โ pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2026] UKAITUR UI2025005096
Common Room
0 comments ยท About the Common Room โ
No comments yet โ start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.