What is the ratio in Van Duyn v Home Office?

The ratio is that EU directives can have direct effect against member states if sufficiently clear and unconditional, and that restrictions on free movement based on personal conduct can include intended association with organizations.

What did the court decide in Van Duyn v Home Office?

The ECJ decided that while directives can have direct effect, the UK could lawfully refuse Van Duyn entry based on her intended employment with Scientology as a matter of public policy.

Why is Van Duyn v Home Office important for EU law?

It established that directives can have vertical direct effect against states, significantly expanding the scope of directly enforceable EU rights beyond Treaty provisions.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library